1 Temat przez Skubi (edytowany przez Skubi 2015-04-03 18:43:29)

  • Skubi
  • Użytkownik
  • Nieaktywny
  • Zarejestrowany: 2011-12-08
  • Posty: 145

Temat: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Hej,
Dziś zabrałem się za aktualizacje 1043nd do Luci z ostatniej wersji gargoyle.
Po update wszedłem i skonfigurowany został wan na PPPoE jak poprzednio.  Niestety, ale ani w diagnostyce, ani po kablu ani po wifi nie ma internetu. Pojawia się na moment podczas restartu, ale to tylko ułamek sekundy google chrome pobiera powiadomienia..

Sprawdzam pliki po SCP bowiem mam backup plików z Gargoyli i nie wiem sam gdzie jest problem, czego nie zrobilem...

PPPoE jest podłączone, mimo to nic...

Nie wiem czego nie zrobilem, albo co zrobiłem nie tak. Pomocy

2 Odpowiedź przez Cezary

  • Skąd: Warszawa
  • Zarejestrowany: 2006-02-25
  • Posty: 115,919

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

uci show network
ifup wan
logread

pokaż

Masz niepotrzebny router, uszkodzony czy nie - chętnie przygarnę go.

Cezary's Strona

3 Odpowiedź przez Skubi (edytowany przez Skubi 2015-04-03 19:07:58)

  • Skubi
  • Użytkownik
  • Nieaktywny
  • Zarejestrowany: 2011-12-08
  • Posty: 145

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

login as: root
root@192.168.1.1's password:


BusyBox v1.22.1 (2015-03-28 06:57:02 CET) built-in shell (ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.


                   _            _____ _____
                  | |          / ____|_   _|
                  | |    _   _| |      | |
                  | |   | | | | |      | |
                  | |___| |_| | |____ _| |_
                  |______\__,_|\_____|_____|

 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 |                                                              |
 | OpenWrt Barrier Breaker (r44952)                             |
 | Build time: 2015-03-28 08:47 CET                             |
 |                                                              |
 | Cezary Jackiewicz (obsy), http://eko.one.pl                  |
 |                                                              |
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 | Machine: TP-Link TL-WR1043N/ND v1                            |
 | Uptime: 0d, 00:02:03                                         |
 | Load: 1.25 0.46 0.17                                         |
 | Flash: total: 1.5MB, free: 1.3MB, used: 16%                  |
 | Memory: total: 28.2MB, free: 13.4MB, used: 52%               |
 | WAN: 192.168.201.208, proto: pppoe                           |
 | LAN: 192.168.1.1                                             |
 ----------------------------------------------------------------
root@OpenWrt:~# uci show network
network.loopback=interface
network.loopback.ifname=lo
network.loopback.proto=static
network.loopback.ipaddr=127.0.0.1
network.loopback.netmask=255.0.0.0
network.globals=globals
network.globals.ula_prefix=fde0:3a42:6fc3::/48
network.lan=interface
network.lan.ifname=eth0.1
network.lan.force_link=1
network.lan.type=bridge
network.lan.proto=static
network.lan.ipaddr=192.168.1.1
network.lan.netmask=255.255.255.0
network.lan.ip6assign=60
network.wan=interface
network.wan.ifname=eth0.2
network.wan._orig_ifname=eth0.2
network.wan._orig_bridge=false
network.wan.proto=pppoe
network.wan.username=login
network.wan.password=haslo
network.wan6=interface
network.wan6.ifname=@wan
network.wan6.proto=dhcpv6
network.@switch[0]=switch
network.@switch[0].name=switch0
network.@switch[0].reset=1
network.@switch[0].enable_vlan=1
network.@switch_vlan[0]=switch_vlan
network.@switch_vlan[0].device=switch0
network.@switch_vlan[0].vlan=1
network.@switch_vlan[0].ports=1 2 3 4 5t
network.@switch_vlan[1]=switch_vlan
network.@switch_vlan[1].device=switch0
network.@switch_vlan[1].vlan=2
network.@switch_vlan[1].ports=0 5t
root@OpenWrt:~# ifup wan
root@OpenWrt:~# logread
Fri Apr  3 20:00:41 2015 daemon.notice netifd: VLAN 'eth0.2' link is up
Fri Apr  3 20:00:41 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' has link connectivity
Fri Apr  3 20:00:42 2015 daemon.warn odhcpd[1120]: DHCPV6 SOLICIT IA_NA from 000100011c3eca91001d92450053 on br-lan: ok fde0:3a42:6fc3::461/128
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 kern.info kernel: [   26.750000] cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: PL
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 kern.info kernel: [   26.910000] cfg80211: Regulatory domain changed to country: PL
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 kern.info kernel: [   26.920000] cfg80211:  DFS Master region: ETSI
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 kern.info kernel: [   26.920000] cfg80211:   (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp), (dfs_cac_time)
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 kern.info kernel: [   26.930000] cfg80211:   (2402000 KHz - 2482000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm), (N/A)
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 kern.info kernel: [   26.940000] cfg80211:   (5170000 KHz - 5250000 KHz @ 80000 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm), (N/A)
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 kern.info kernel: [   26.950000] cfg80211:   (5250000 KHz - 5330000 KHz @ 80000 KHz), (N/A, 2000 mBm), (0 s)
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 kern.info kernel: [   26.960000] cfg80211:   (5490000 KHz - 5710000 KHz @ 80000 KHz), (N/A, 2700 mBm), (0 s)
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 kern.info kernel: [   26.970000] cfg80211:   (57240000 KHz - 65880000 KHz @ 2160000 KHz), (N/A, 4000 mBm), (N/A)
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 kern.info kernel: [   27.170000] br-lan: port 1(eth0.1) entered forwarding state
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 daemon.info pppd[1260]: Plugin rp-pppoe.so loaded.
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 daemon.info pppd[1260]: RP-PPPoE plugin version 3.8p compiled against pppd 2.4.7
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 daemon.notice pppd[1260]: pppd 2.4.7 started by root, uid 0
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 daemon.info pppd[1260]: PPP session is 26308
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1260]: Connected to 4c:5e:0c:4d:3a:93 via interface eth0.2
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 daemon.info pppd[1260]: Using interface pppoe-wan
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 daemon.notice pppd[1260]: Connect: pppoe-wan <--> eth0.2
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 daemon.notice pppd[1260]: CHAP authentication succeeded
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 daemon.notice pppd[1260]: peer from calling number 4C:5E:0C:4D:3A:93 authorized
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 daemon.notice pppd[1260]: local  IP address 192.168.201.208
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 daemon.notice pppd[1260]: remote IP address 192.168.200.1
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 daemon.notice pppd[1260]: primary   DNS address 91.240.130.101
Fri Apr  3 20:00:43 2015 daemon.notice pppd[1260]: secondary DNS address 91.240.130.100
Fri Apr  3 20:00:44 2015 daemon.notice pppd[1260]: MPPE 128-bit stateless compression enabled
Fri Apr  3 20:00:44 2015 authpriv.info dropbear[1272]: Not backgrounding
Fri Apr  3 20:00:44 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Network device 'pppoe-wan' link is up
Fri Apr  3 20:00:44 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan6' is enabled
Fri Apr  3 20:00:44 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Network alias 'pppoe-wan' link is up
Fri Apr  3 20:00:44 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan6' has link connectivity
Fri Apr  3 20:00:44 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan6' is setting up now
Fri Apr  3 20:00:44 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' is now up
Fri Apr  3 20:00:45 2015 user.notice firewall: Reloading firewall due to ifup of lan (br-lan)
Fri Apr  3 20:00:46 2015 daemon.warn odhcpd[1120]: DHCPV6 SOLICIT IA_NA from 000100011c3eca91001d92450053 on br-lan: ok fde0:3a42:6fc3::461/128
Fri Apr  3 20:00:46 2015 daemon.warn odhcpd[1120]: DHCPV6 REQUEST IA_NA from 000100011c3eca91001d92450053 on br-lan: ok fde0:3a42:6fc3::461/128
Fri Apr  3 20:00:46 2015 user.err syslog: module is already loaded - xt_multiport
Fri Apr  3 20:00:46 2015 user.err syslog: module is already loaded - xt_comment
Fri Apr  3 20:00:46 2015 user.err syslog: module is already loaded - xt_length
Fri Apr  3 20:00:48 2015 user.err syslog: module is already loaded - xt_multiport
Fri Apr  3 20:00:48 2015 user.err syslog: module is already loaded - xt_comment
Fri Apr  3 20:00:48 2015 user.err syslog: module is already loaded - xt_length
Fri Apr  3 20:00:51 2015 daemon.crit xl2tpd[1679]: setsockopt recvref[30]: Protocol not available
Fri Apr  3 20:00:51 2015 daemon.info xl2tpd[1679]: Using l2tp kernel support.
Fri Apr  3 20:00:51 2015 daemon.info xl2tpd[1681]: xl2tpd version xl2tpd-1.3.6 started on OpenWrt PID:1681
Fri Apr  3 20:00:51 2015 daemon.info xl2tpd[1681]: Written by Mark Spencer, Copyright (C) 1998, Adtran, Inc.
Fri Apr  3 20:00:51 2015 daemon.info xl2tpd[1681]: Forked by Scott Balmos and David Stipp, (C) 2001
Fri Apr  3 20:00:51 2015 daemon.info xl2tpd[1681]: Inherited by Jeff McAdams, (C) 2002
Fri Apr  3 20:00:51 2015 daemon.info xl2tpd[1681]: Forked again by Xelerance (www.xelerance.com) (C) 2006
Fri Apr  3 20:00:51 2015 daemon.info xl2tpd[1681]: Listening on IP address 0.0.0.0, port 1701
Fri Apr  3 20:00:52 2015 daemon.info dnsmasq[1687]: started, version 2.71 cachesize 150
Fri Apr  3 20:00:52 2015 daemon.info dnsmasq[1687]: compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt no-DBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP no-DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack no-ipset no-auth no-DNSSEC
Fri Apr  3 20:00:52 2015 daemon.info dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP, IP range 192.168.1.100 -- 192.168.1.249, lease time 12h
Fri Apr  3 20:00:52 2015 daemon.info dnsmasq[1687]: using local addresses only for domain lan
Fri Apr  3 20:00:52 2015 daemon.info dnsmasq[1687]: reading /tmp/resolv.conf.auto
Fri Apr  3 20:00:52 2015 daemon.info dnsmasq[1687]: using local addresses only for domain lan
Fri Apr  3 20:00:52 2015 daemon.info dnsmasq[1687]: using nameserver 91.240.130.101#53
Fri Apr  3 20:00:52 2015 daemon.info dnsmasq[1687]: using nameserver 91.240.130.100#53
Fri Apr  3 20:00:52 2015 daemon.info dnsmasq[1687]: read /etc/hosts - 1 addresses
Fri Apr  3 20:00:52 2015 daemon.info dnsmasq[1687]: read /tmp/hosts/dhcp - 1 addresses
Fri Apr  3 20:00:52 2015 daemon.info dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: read /etc/ethers - 0 addresses
Fri Apr  3 20:00:53 2015 user.emerg syslog: setting up led USB
Fri Apr  3 20:00:53 2015 user.emerg syslog: setting up led WLAN
Fri Apr  3 20:00:54 2015 daemon.err miniupnpd[1762]: could not open lease file: /var/upnp.leases
Fri Apr  3 20:00:54 2015 daemon.err miniupnpd[1762]: Why did you run me anyway?
Fri Apr  3 20:00:54 2015 user.emerg syslog: - init complete -
Fri Apr  3 20:00:55 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:00:55 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:00:55 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:00:56 2015 user.notice firewall: Reloading firewall due to ifup of wan (pppoe-wan)
Fri Apr  3 20:00:58 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:00:58 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:00:59 2015 daemon.err miniupnpd[2168]: could not open lease file: /var/upnp.leases
Fri Apr  3 20:00:59 2015 daemon.err miniupnpd[2168]: Why did you run me anyway?
Fri Apr  3 20:01:00 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:02:46 2015 daemon.info pppd[1260]: System time change detected.
Fri Apr  3 20:02:46 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:02:47 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:02:49 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:02:50 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:02:50 2015 daemon.info dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCPREQUEST(br-lan) 192.168.1.133 00:1d:92:45:00:53
Fri Apr  3 20:02:50 2015 daemon.info dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCPACK(br-lan) 192.168.1.133 00:1d:92:45:00:53 PC-Komputer
Fri Apr  3 20:02:52 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:02:53 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:02:54 2015 daemon.info dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCPINFORM(br-lan) 192.168.1.133 00:1d:92:45:00:53
Fri Apr  3 20:02:54 2015 daemon.info dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCPACK(br-lan) 192.168.1.133 00:1d:92:45:00:53 PC-Komputer
Fri Apr  3 20:02:54 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:02:55 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:02:57 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:02:58 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:02:59 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:00 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:01 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:02 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:02 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:06 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:06 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:09 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:13 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:14 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:14 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:16 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:18 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:19 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:19 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:20 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:21 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:22 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:24 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:26 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:27 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:28 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:31 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:32 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:32 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:36 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:37 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:41 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:42 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:42 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:45 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:46 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:47 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:47 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:49 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:51 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:52 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:53 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:54 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:54 2015 authpriv.info dropbear[2872]: Child connection from 192.168.1.133:60437
Fri Apr  3 20:03:55 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:56 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:59 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:03:59 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:04:03 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:04:04 2015 authpriv.notice dropbear[2872]: Password auth succeeded for 'root' from 192.168.1.133:60437
Fri Apr  3 20:04:04 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:04:05 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:04:06 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:04:08 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:04:11 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:04:12 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:04:15 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:04:17 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:04:18 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan6' is now down
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan6' is disabled
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.info pppd[1260]: Terminating on signal 15
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.info pppd[1260]: Connect time 1.9 minutes.
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.info pppd[1260]: Sent 192952 bytes, received 1421436 bytes.
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Network device 'pppoe-wan' link is down
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.err pppd[1260]: MPPE disabled
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.notice pppd[1260]: Connection terminated.
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.info pppd[1260]: Exit.
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' is now down
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' is disabled
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' is enabled
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' is setting up now
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.notice netifd: VLAN 'eth0.2' link is down
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' has link connectivity loss
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.notice netifd: VLAN 'eth0.2' link is up
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' has link connectivity
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 user.notice mwan3: ifdown interface wan (unknown)
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:04:19 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.info pppd[3379]: Plugin rp-pppoe.so loaded.
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.info pppd[3379]: RP-PPPoE plugin version 3.8p compiled against pppd 2.4.7
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.notice pppd[3379]: pppd 2.4.7 started by root, uid 0
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.info pppd[3379]: PPP session is 26310
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.warn pppd[3379]: Connected to 4c:5e:0c:4d:3a:93 via interface eth0.2
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.info pppd[3379]: Using interface pppoe-wan
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.notice pppd[3379]: Connect: pppoe-wan <--> eth0.2
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.notice pppd[3379]: CHAP authentication succeeded
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.notice pppd[3379]: peer from calling number 4C:5E:0C:4D:3A:93 authorized
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq[1687]: no servers found in /tmp/resolv.conf.auto, will retry
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.notice pppd[3379]: local  IP address 192.168.201.208
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.notice pppd[3379]: remote IP address 192.168.200.1
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.notice pppd[3379]: primary   DNS address 91.240.130.101
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.notice pppd[3379]: secondary DNS address 91.240.130.100
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.notice pppd[3379]: MPPE 128-bit stateless compression enabled
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.warn dnsmasq-dhcp[1687]: DHCP packet received on eth0.2 which has no address
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Network device 'pppoe-wan' link is up
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan6' is enabled
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan6' is setting up now
Fri Apr  3 20:04:20 2015 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' is now up
root@OpenWrt:~#

4 Odpowiedź przez Cezary

  • Skąd: Warszawa
  • Zarejestrowany: 2006-02-25
  • Posty: 115,919

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Było i się rozłączył po prostu.

Masz niepotrzebny router, uszkodzony czy nie - chętnie przygarnę go.

Cezary's Strona

5 Odpowiedź przez Skubi (edytowany przez Skubi 2015-04-03 19:20:26)

  • Skubi
  • Użytkownik
  • Nieaktywny
  • Zarejestrowany: 2011-12-08
  • Posty: 145

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Nie bardzo rozumiem, mam wrócić na gargoyle i zapomniec czy są jakieś kroki które powinienem wykonać?

Tutaj co jakiś czas rozłącza podejrzewam ze przez te błędy którymi sieje pomiędzy... Tak też podpowiada mi google

6 Odpowiedź przez Cezary

  • Skąd: Warszawa
  • Zarejestrowany: 2006-02-25
  • Posty: 115,919

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Nie chcesz tych komunikatów to zrób
echo "except-interface=eth0.2" >> /etc/dnsmasq.conf
/etc/init.d/dnsmasq restart

Masz niepotrzebny router, uszkodzony czy nie - chętnie przygarnę go.

Cezary's Strona

7 Odpowiedź przez Skubi (edytowany przez Skubi 2015-04-03 19:41:12)

  • Skubi
  • Użytkownik
  • Nieaktywny
  • Zarejestrowany: 2011-12-08
  • Posty: 145

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Wpisałem to plus pppd opcje debug i noipdefault

Teraz sypie pppd unsupported protocol received

Cos mu się nie podoba i dlatego po jakims czasie rozłącza, tylko jeszcze nie wiem co..

Edit
http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/howto … _protrej_1

Coś tu wyczytałem tylko jeszcze nie wiem jak się zabrać za to...

8 Odpowiedź przez sebastan

  • Zarejestrowany: 2012-10-05
  • Posty: 449

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Miałem identyczny objaw i pomogła zmiana MTU na 1492. Nie wiem, czy to uniwersalna rada, czy tylko mojego przypadku.

9 Odpowiedź przez Skubi (edytowany przez Skubi 2015-04-03 22:52:34)

  • Skubi
  • Użytkownik
  • Nieaktywny
  • Zarejestrowany: 2011-12-08
  • Posty: 145

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Niestety przestawienie MTU na 1492 nie pomogło, jakieś inne pomysły?

Dodam, że log wygląda mniej więcej tak teraz:

015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 'IP6 Header Compression' (0x4f) received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x10 00 4f b7 d4 d2 17 8c 39 2e 44 b5 06 4d d4 4e 0e e7 26 c5 d9 f8 93 ce 1a 99 64 d8 d3 b1 bf 67 4c ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x4220] 29 b5 0a f5 dc b8 96 76 b0 be e1 46 3a e9 2f a4 70 3c ef 54 a8 51 6c c0 9c b6 a5 46 78 30 b0 9c ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x4220 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x11 42 20 29 b5 0a f5 dc b8 96 76 b0 be e1 46 3a e9 2f a4 70 3c ef 54 a8 51 6c c0 9c b6 a5 46 78 30 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x2d8] ab ae 58 72 4b 18 0d 19 ad 07 f4 42 cb 15 d2 aa ea 93 64 91 db 6b 20 4a 32 c1 7d c9 88 ef 3f 36 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x2d8 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x12 02 d8 ab ae 58 72 4b 18 0d 19 ad 07 f4 42 cb 15 d2 aa ea 93 64 91 db 6b 20 4a 32 c1 7d c9 88 ef ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xe20e] 1d 37 82 a7 10 69 65 e4 fd e5 1d 57 ee 67 15 16 c5 31 97 6d 11 f8 64 d8 4a ea 57 7b 49 a4 83 39 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xe20e received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x13 e2 0e 1d 37 82 a7 10 69 65 e4 fd e5 1d 57 ee 67 15 16 c5 31 97 6d 11 f8 64 d8 4a ea 57 7b 49 a4 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xcf] ec 82 cf b7 c2 e0 7e f4 98 3d 31 04 cb b3 e7 93 61 39 64 e6 b0 af 08 f6 52 a5 e5 c1 f4 09 40 f2 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xcf received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x14 00 cf ec 82 cf b7 c2 e0 7e f4 98 3d 31 04 cb b3 e7 93 61 39 64 e6 b0 af 08 f6 52 a5 e5 c1 f4 09 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x5cbe] 4c 8f 7a 5a f1 ae 85 07 b2 c5 f5 e5 dd 92 f5 66 19 a6 80 eb d5 58 1f 3d ec 1a 6f ee e1 c6 26 6d ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x5cbe received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x15 5c be 4c 8f 7a 5a f1 ae 85 07 b2 c5 f5 e5 dd 92 f5 66 19 a6 80 eb d5 58 1f 3d ec 1a 6f ee e1 c6 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xe420] b3 0b 71 71 cd ce 5c 6e fb 54 7c 13 b4 55 d0 eb 37 3e 4e 73 53 0f 4b b3 bd bc 6e 24 3d 0e fe 4e ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xe420 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x16 e4 20 b3 0b 71 71 cd ce 5c 6e fb 54 7c 13 b4 55 d0 eb 37 3e 4e 73 53 0f 4b b3 bd bc 6e 24 3d 0e ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x77] b8 1f 4b a4 47 d5 7c b8 8e e9 9c 77 f2 42 0b f9 a9 1e e6 14 02 0d 08 72 a5 82 03 ec de b9 7f 3f ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x77 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x17 00 77 b8 1f 4b a4 47 d5 7c b8 8e e9 9c 77 f2 42 0b f9 a9 1e e6 14 02 0d 08 72 a5 82 03 ec de b9 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xc822] 2f a4 96 4d bc 79 a7 32 14 07 50 cb 62 e8 c0 d5 e9 35 b3 9b 47 0d 49 a8 20 6e 6a b4 43 09 f3 47 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xc822 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x18 c8 22 2f a4 96 4d bc 79 a7 32 14 07 50 cb 62 e8 c0 d5 e9 35 b3 9b 47 0d 49 a8 20 6e 6a b4 43 09 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x3] 75 bd b4 33 45 e1 2d 73 6c 59 a8 10 21 2b b8 a0 3f b4 a8 d2 b8 18 32 3c 25 dc e9 ce c7 83 f3 25 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x3 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x19 00 03 75 bd b4 33 45 e1 2d 73 6c 59 a8 10 21 2b b8 a0 3f b4 a8 d2 b8 18 32 3c 25 dc e9 ce c7 83 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x71] 40 01 b2 57 4f 2a 4f 46 91 a8 79 b4 f2 4c ab 9a 0b d4 9e 5f 9b ca c5 0f db 52 38 4e 34 0b 34 3f ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x71 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x1a 00 71 40 01 b2 57 4f 2a 4f 46 91 a8 79 b4 f2 4c ab 9a 0b d4 9e 5f 9b ca c5 0f db 52 38 4e 34 0b ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x1813] e9 62 a1 7e 49 44 83 8e 69 5e 79 74 21 d9 e2 7b f4 97 fe 57 94 41 ec d1 bf 42 18 e5 b6 d4 4a 04 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x1813 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x1b 18 13 e9 62 a1 7e 49 44 83 8e 69 5e 79 74 21 d9 e2 7b f4 97 fe 57 94 41 ec d1 bf 42 18 e5 b6 d4 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xcd] e9 9a 55 d1 5e 62 1d e2 5b d4 8d 77 50 b1 1e b8 46 59 4c 18 6b 44 4c 7a 4d 89 12 0d 58 35 af 51 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xcd received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x1c 00 cd e9 9a 55 d1 5e 62 1d e2 5b d4 8d 77 50 b1 1e b8 46 59 4c 18 6b 44 4c 7a 4d 89 12 0d 58 35 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xd5] 53 74 eb af 30 63 cc 1a d5 7c 70 d6 21 6e a0 ca 40 c4 cb 77 02 45 bf 6f 4a 7d ee 3b b2 9a bc bd ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xd5 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:09 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x1d 00 d5 53 74 eb af 30 63 cc 1a d5 7c 70 d6 21 6e a0 ca 40 c4 cb 77 02 45 bf 6f 4a 7d ee 3b b2 9a ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x5f] f9 cf 2d 56 2c 4c b6 78 4f 7a 1d b9 c2 e5 d5 a8 68 d4 ed da c1 36 a5 66 e2 97 cc db cb de 11 6c ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x5f received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x1e 00 5f f9 cf 2d 56 2c 4c b6 78 4f 7a 1d b9 c2 e5 d5 a8 68 d4 ed da c1 36 a5 66 e2 97 cc db cb de ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xf] c5 8d 2f f4 9b aa 36 d7 9c ac b7 a6 79 1f ed c3 d7 46 c4 b0 04 8a f7 67 bd 98 b5 ca 0a bd 8e ab ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xf received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x1f 00 0f c5 8d 2f f4 9b aa 36 d7 9c ac b7 a6 79 1f ed c3 d7 46 c4 b0 04 8a f7 67 bd 98 b5 ca 0a bd ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xb619] 46 32 91 f0 04 76 e3 66 86 fe 8e 92 b0 92 ec 88 5c 91 7d c5 df 82 84 ee 2c 4d c4 cc 6d 77 1b 97 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xb619 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x20 b6 19 46 32 91 f0 04 76 e3 66 86 fe 8e 92 b0 92 ec 88 5c 91 7d c5 df 82 84 ee 2c 4d c4 cc 6d 77 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x1683] 2c a3 32 14 7e ec 9b 14 ab 1e 3e ec 4b d1 8f c6 c8 1a f1 e5 e3 5e e5 aa ff dd e5 e2 2a 71 1f 7a ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x1683 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x21 16 83 2c a3 32 14 7e ec 9b 14 ab 1e 3e ec 4b d1 8f c6 c8 1a f1 e5 e3 5e e5 aa ff dd e5 e2 2a 71 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xf9] 9b 22 9f 4f 9f dd 24 b5 f2 84 d8 da 0b f7 e5 56 ca ff 67 c5 27 96 a3 0e 2d 74 63 c7 ce 31 f0 12 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xf9 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x22 00 f9 9b 22 9f 4f 9f dd 24 b5 f2 84 d8 da 0b f7 e5 56 ca ff 67 c5 27 96 a3 0e 2d 74 63 c7 ce 31 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xb9] f2 49 08 9b d5 bc c3 55 3c 0a 78 3c bb 6a a8 c8 19 84 82 c7 98 cf 58 05 7f 63 12 f0 0d 19 f1 0b ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xb9 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x23 00 b9 f2 49 08 9b d5 bc c3 55 3c 0a 78 3c bb 6a a8 c8 19 84 82 c7 98 cf 58 05 7f 63 12 f0 0d 19 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x16eb] fb 8a b3 90 60 7a 23 22 46 9d 54 9d 55 0c 46 2e 1d 38 86 61 c2 4e 77 06 48 b9 c6 1c bd eb 35 eb ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x16eb received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x24 16 eb fb 8a b3 90 60 7a 23 22 46 9d 54 9d 55 0c 46 2e 1d 38 86 61 c2 4e 77 06 48 b9 c6 1c bd eb ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x4451] 01 16 38 83 a4 7e 79 12 ce c0 7c 1e d3 2a 09 48 20 89 ce b6 45 cb 8a fb ac 09 73 fc bd 24 2e c4 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x4451 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x25 44 51 01 16 38 83 a4 7e 79 12 ce c0 7c 1e d3 2a 09 48 20 89 ce b6 45 cb 8a fb ac 09 73 fc bd 24 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xaf] 88 6b e2 f5 48 cf 6d 1e 7c 1d 64 0d a5 3f 98 fb 58 6d 27 3f 26 06 62 6e 65 90 e8 24 af ec 92 f1 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xaf received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x26 00 af 88 6b e2 f5 48 cf 6d 1e 7c 1d 64 0d a5 3f 98 fb 58 6d 27 3f 26 06 62 6e 65 90 e8 24 af ec ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xf7] 1c 40 ca bc d9 a5 38 cd 56 9b 14 34 f3 f5 ab 72 c7 52 c5 e2 bf 31 03 88 bf 0e 5a 51 d8 0f 47 f9 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xf7 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x27 00 f7 1c 40 ca bc d9 a5 38 cd 56 9b 14 34 f3 f5 ab 72 c7 52 c5 e2 bf 31 03 88 bf 0e 5a 51 d8 0f ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x98dc] 84 95 49 6b 21 a6 d3 c7 8f 29 a3 5b 6c 9e 00 91 c6 72 4a 6e e5 3c 63 91 85 0f 9a 29 90 3d 9f a0 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x98dc received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x28 98 dc 84 95 49 6b 21 a6 d3 c7 8f 29 a3 5b 6c 9e 00 91 c6 72 4a 6e e5 3c 63 91 85 0f 9a 29 90 3d ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x9b] f2 b9 8b d2 f8 1b 09 dc 56 30 4e 6d f8 2b ee 1d 45 85 bc 18 c8 9e 79 ab 11 c8 66 a9 f2 2a db f5 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x9b received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xa9] 0a 25 0a 97 a1 93 64 53 92 14 83 bf d7 73 1f 0e d5 58 e0 02 d2 67 05 b8 0f 10 d2 a9 30 c2 ff 14 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xa9 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x2a 00 a9 0a 25 0a 97 a1 93 64 53 92 14 83 bf d7 73 1f 0e d5 58 e0 02 d2 67 05 b8 0f 10 d2 a9 30 c2 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x4d] 30 8e 78 d5 71 42 1a d2 33 40 fe 4e 69 4d 66 f5 34 10 77 d0 d8 9d ba b6 8a 60 f5 cb 50 33 b7 0d ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x4d received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x2b 00 4d 30 8e 78 d5 71 42 1a d2 33 40 fe 4e 69 4d 66 f5 34 10 77 d0 d8 9d ba b6 8a 60 f5 cb 50 33 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xe0cf] a4 28 e9 eb 89 68 13 c3 aa f8 8a 61 ad 05 52 53 29 3a b0 97 11 d3 26 1c 16 c5 e5 77 f2 ff 98 65 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xe0cf received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x2c e0 cf a4 28 e9 eb 89 68 13 c3 aa f8 8a 61 ad 05 52 53 29 3a b0 97 11 d3 26 1c 16 c5 e5 77 f2 ff ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x66f7] ca 4b 4e b6 b5 b2 0c 0d 77 7f 60 df 66 3a 63 f0 0a ce 45 a4 f0 9b 75 c4 fc ac 97 be 6d 1f 7c 1c ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x66f7 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xf849] 1c f7 11 f2 f1 f2 af 0c 33 41 77 c1 2a ce a7 83 44 b1 41 4c f2 6a 23 09 fc d3 c9 a8 3f 07 f8 8f ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xf849 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x2e f8 49 1c f7 11 f2 f1 f2 af 0c 33 41 77 c1 2a ce a7 83 44 b1 41 4c f2 6a 23 09 fc d3 c9 a8 3f 07 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x63] 37 fc 02 1e e0 47 67 15 ed 20 53 a1 ed e5 28 86 ce 3f 03 0e cd b9 db 59 50 7d c2 94 86 83 43 15 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 'RTP IPHC Compressed TCP' (0x63) received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x2f 00 63 37 fc 02 1e e0 47 67 15 ed 20 53 a1 ed e5 28 86 ce 3f 03 0e cd b9 db 59 50 7d c2 94 86 83 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x7ca2] 8b 9f b1 5c c0 51 ae 8b 8c ba 34 18 57 0e 79 37 01 df cc 60 b2 7c 5e e4 21 90 88 50 39 1d 45 dc ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x7ca2 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x30 7c a2 8b 9f b1 5c c0 51 ae 8b 8c ba 34 18 57 0e 79 37 01 df cc 60 b2 7c 5e e4 21 90 88 50 39 1d ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xdc24] 74 63 e2 c0 8f cc 61 59 46 bb 4c 29 2d b7 0c 39 ad 11 09 c7 69 e3 a6 56 91 9f ec e8 cb e5 7c d2 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xdc24 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x31 dc 24 74 63 e2 c0 8f cc 61 59 46 bb 4c 29 2d b7 0c 39 ad 11 09 c7 69 e3 a6 56 91 9f ec e8 cb e5 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xb0b2] 9f 1b cd df bd 58 3e 50 32 83 81 d1 06 8f 3b 4c e8 21 e0 d7 dd c9 6a fa 5b 3e 2a d0 9c 84 e3 f1 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xb0b2 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x32 b0 b2 9f 1b cd df bd 58 3e 50 32 83 81 d1 06 8f 3b 4c e8 21 e0 d7 dd c9 6a fa 5b 3e 2a d0 9c 84 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xfb] d2 9e c6 89 54 91 3a 12 48 85 91 d6 17 e0 a6 be 10 25 d0 f8 00 06 ae 04 e1 8f 31 07 c0 c0 e7 ca ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 'single-link compression' (0xfb) received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x33 00 fb d2 9e c6 89 54 91 3a 12 48 85 91 d6 17 e0 a6 be 10 25 d0 f8 00 06 ae 04 e1 8f 31 07 c0 c0 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xa3] 23 98 6c 26 fb 74 5a 41 88 52 78 b6 6a c0 06 49 0a d5 d8 0d fe a3 f9 90 fc 4b 84 5e be a9 52 89 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xa3 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x34 00 a3 23 98 6c 26 fb 74 5a 41 88 52 78 b6 6a c0 06 49 0a d5 d8 0d fe a3 f9 90 fc 4b 84 5e be a9 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xdf] 1d fd 93 50 c8 1c 84 f2 d7 ee fb c8 53 21 1d 31 ce 90 77 dd bb f4 c8 1f 22 13 4a ed b9 24 95 14 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xdf received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x35 00 df 1d fd 93 50 c8 1c 84 f2 d7 ee fb c8 53 21 1d 31 ce 90 77 dd bb f4 c8 1f 22 13 4a ed b9 24 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x8d] f7 fd e3 22 cc c1 8a 28 8e 6c bc 0a b6 6d 4b b7 cb 0b e8 2b 9e 0c 1c 74 7b dc d4 a5 b7 c9 e0 f8 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x8d received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x36 00 8d f7 fd e3 22 cc c1 8a 28 8e 6c bc 0a b6 6d 4b b7 cb 0b e8 2b 9e 0c 1c 74 7b dc d4 a5 b7 c9 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x7af3] c4 0f 1d f8 22 73 1b 1f a2 e4 c9 03 d3 06 8f 97 16 3c 5c 78 0e e4 e2 e6 24 27 62 40 33 44 cb d5 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x7af3 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x37 7a f3 c4 0f 1d f8 22 73 1b 1f a2 e4 c9 03 d3 06 8f 97 16 3c 5c 78 0e e4 e2 e6 24 27 62 40 33 44 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0x1d] aa d2 56 6e 5a a9 3e ba 5a 51 10 d3 8a cf 64 01 fb 3e 33 71 93 a7 d1 44 5c 6d e8 7f c4 75 b0 96 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0x1d received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x38 00 1d aa d2 56 6e 5a a9 3e ba 5a 51 10 d3 8a cf 64 01 fb 3e 33 71 93 a7 d1 44 5c 6d e8 7f c4 75 ...]
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: rcvd [proto=0xc7] 3f 85 e8 fb c4 34 f7 1d 92 24 3f ba ea 29 5b c4 4c 6e 07 8b e8 e3 2c 9b 1c 72 db d5 2d 45 6e a3 ...
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.warn pppd[1261]: Unsupported protocol 0xc7 received
Fri Apr  3 23:39:10 2015 daemon.debug pppd[1261]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x39 00 c7 3f 85 e8 fb c4 34 f7 1d 92 24 3f ba ea 29 5b c4 4c 6e 07 8b e8 e3 2c 9b 1c 72 db d5 2d 45 ...]

Wróciłem na ostatnią gargoyle - przywróciłem backup i wszystko działa...

Jakieś pomysły?

10 Odpowiedź przez Cezary

  • Skąd: Warszawa
  • Zarejestrowany: 2006-02-25
  • Posty: 115,919

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Ten "Unsupported protocol" to raczej sieczka w danych a nie niewspierany protokół. Bo takiej ilości protokołów nie ma smile

Masz niepotrzebny router, uszkodzony czy nie - chętnie przygarnę go.

Cezary's Strona

11 Odpowiedź przez Skubi (edytowany przez Skubi 2015-04-03 23:01:09)

  • Skubi
  • Użytkownik
  • Nieaktywny
  • Zarejestrowany: 2011-12-08
  • Posty: 145

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Ja jestem zielony w temacie jak skórka na tym forum. Możesz proszę napisać co zmienić / sprawdzić / zrobić, żeby to zagrało? Wróciłem do gargolca i od strzała mam neta...

12 Odpowiedź przez Cezary

  • Skąd: Warszawa
  • Zarejestrowany: 2006-02-25
  • Posty: 115,919

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Nie mam pojęcia. Nigdy w sumie nie używałem pppoe na jakąś szerszą skalę. Wiem tyle o tym co google mówi. f

Masz niepotrzebny router, uszkodzony czy nie - chętnie przygarnę go.

Cezary's Strona

13 Odpowiedź przez sebastan

  • Zarejestrowany: 2012-10-05
  • Posty: 449

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Naprawdę obstawiam MTU, być może akurat nie 1492. Odtwarzałem ten przypadek z 10 razy. Na domyślnym 1500 po wpisaniu danych PPPoE net był na ułamek sekundy i znikał. Zmiana na 1492 net wskakiwał. Byc może inna wartość MTU powinna być u Ciebie.

14 Odpowiedź przez Skubi

  • Skubi
  • Użytkownik
  • Nieaktywny
  • Zarejestrowany: 2011-12-08
  • Posty: 145

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Tylko, że na gargoyle jest MTU 1500 i wszystko gra od strzała.
Ja nie mam pojęcia co mógłbym zrobić, także wygląda na to, że jestem skazany na gargoyle... A tak chciałem spróbować luci sad

15 Odpowiedź przez pyra73

  • pyra73
  • Użytkownik
  • Nieaktywny
  • Zarejestrowany: 2013-05-07
  • Posty: 93

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Witam, masz wersję v1, czy v2. Ja mam podobny problem z wersją v2, ale net działa poprawnie tylko do pierwszego rozłączenia neostrady, potem brak. Działa ponownie dopiero po restarcie rutera. Niestety problem nie rozwiązany.

16 Odpowiedź przez Skubi

  • Skubi
  • Użytkownik
  • Nieaktywny
  • Zarejestrowany: 2011-12-08
  • Posty: 145

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Hej. Ja mam v1 i net osiedlowy, który niestety jest na tym protokole pppoe sad pojęcia nie mam, gdzie napisać i do kogo żeby pomógł

17 Odpowiedź przez Skubi

  • Skubi
  • Użytkownik
  • Nieaktywny
  • Zarejestrowany: 2011-12-08
  • Posty: 145

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Po prawie roku czasu podjąłem kolejną próbę. Bezskutecznie. Więcej info:
http://openrouter.info/forum/viewtopic. … amp;t=3624

Gdyby ktoś chciał pomóc, będzie miło.

18 Odpowiedź przez mgniechcial

  • Skąd: Warszawa
  • Zarejestrowany: 2016-03-02
  • Posty: 4

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Witam
postanowiłem się podłączyć pod tego posta ponieważ wykonałem aktualizacje z OpenWrt Chaos Calmer 15.05 (r48023) do najnowszej wersji bez powodzenia na dwóch routerach  TP-Link TL-WR1043N/ND v1 ponieważ nie udało mi się aktualizować ze strony www luci  komunikat "Bad Gateway The process did not produce any response" w czasie aktualizacji.
W drugim wykonałem aktualizacje z linii poleceń i muszę zmienić firmware kabelkiem router nie jest martwy ale poleciała konfiguracja. mam 4 takie routery w chwili obecnej wszystkie pracują (pracowały) z najnowszym OpenWRT z Lucy. Jest to pierwszy problem z jakim się spotkałem w Chaos Calmer. Wcześniejsze aktualizacje były OK.

19 Odpowiedź przez kiko80

  • kiko80
  • Użytkownik
  • Nieaktywny
  • Zarejestrowany: 2015-07-04
  • Posty: 119

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Pewnie wgrałeś obrazy bez gui podaj pełną nazwę firmware

20 Odpowiedź przez mgniechcial

  • Skąd: Warszawa
  • Zarejestrowany: 2016-03-02
  • Posty: 4

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

wgrywałem obraz ostatni datowany na 2016.02.20 o nazwie "luci-15.05-ar71xx-generic-tl-wr1043nd-v1-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin"
poprzez luci w wersji OpenWrt Chaos Calmer 15.05 (r48023) do dwóch takich samych routerów TP-Link TL-WR1043N/ND v1
Podczas aktualizacji dostałem komunikat na stronie WWW "Bad Gateway The process did not produce any response" na obu routerach.

21 Odpowiedź przez Cezary

  • Skąd: Warszawa
  • Zarejestrowany: 2006-02-25
  • Posty: 115,919

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Ta też działa - zrobiłem u siebie na 1043v1, przeszła bez problemów, pojawiło się luci.  To nie jest problem z obrazami.

Masz niepotrzebny router, uszkodzony czy nie - chętnie przygarnę go.

Cezary's Strona

22 Odpowiedź przez mgniechcial

  • Skąd: Warszawa
  • Zarejestrowany: 2016-03-02
  • Posty: 4

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

Ja mam 50/50.
Znaczy aktualizacja z linii poleceń na jednym z routerów zakończyła się poprawnie. Nie wiem czemu pojawiały się komunikaty w przeglądarce po raz pierwszy pojawił się mi komunikat uniemożliwiający aktualizację. Brak ekranu potwierdzającego aktualizacje. Prób wykonałem kilka, pliki ze strony ściągałem trzy razy.
Drugi po aktualizacji która przeszła w porządku i bez błędu z ekranem potwierdzającym wykonanie (trzecia próba przez www luci przeglądarka chrome windows 10 x64) po nie miga dioda sys. Czeka mnie jego reanimacja.
Internet podłączony do eth1 - usb huawei e5272 w sieci jest swich gigabitowy cały ruch po gigabicie
próby wgrania aktualizacji wykonałem na komputerach z systemami x64  windows 10 i debian 8 przeglądarka chrome

23 Odpowiedź przez scalpel

  • Zarejestrowany: 2011-11-12
  • Posty: 108

Odp: Z Gargoyli na Luci i problem..

U mnie też nie chciał przyjąć obrazu z GUI. Dopiero po fitstboot go przyjął. Sytuacja powtarzała się kilkukrotnie.